Too Big To Exist Means Certain Failure

‘Too big to fail’ banks still likely to fail, Nobel winner says

Robert Solow, winner of a 1987 Nobel economics prize, says the U.S. financial system has become too unwieldy to avoid the demise of financial institutions considered “too big to fail.”
The 88-year-old professor emeritus at MIT says the size, complexity and interconnectedness of the U.S. and global financial networks make it harder than ever to judge potential threats to the system. Even the best risk-prevention practices probably won’t stop large banks or other institutions from failing again in the future and damaging the broader economy.

My view:

We have long argued on this blog that the financial system is exceeding fragile despite the appearance of stability.

Banks are not required to keep adequate tangible capital to produce a robust banking system. 

Fractional reserve banking means the risk of bank runs and bank holidays remains very real and endangers the entire system.

Governments enable the banks to take higher and higher risks in exchange for the blind eye that is turned on the extreme risks taken so banks will buy their sovereign bonds.

Yes, dear reader, the fox is indeed guarding the hen house.

Under this blatant and systemic system of moral hazard, certain failure of a large institution seems inevitable.

The question we must ask is this - how do we protect ourselves?


  1. Great post PW.

    We protect ourselves with forewarned Knowledge. Some listen, some refuse to listen and some are in denial. Then we have those who know something is wrong, but just cannot put a finger on it..

    What we have here PW, is the 40 year Neo-Liberal experiment that is steadfast coming to an end, they will not go down peacefully I'm afraid.

    We must watch closely for is which - ism - is bestowed upon us.

    Cheers my Canadian Patriot


Post a Comment